Indonesian youths who are currently pursuing
Master's and Doctoral degrees overseas and inside the country really foster a
sense of optimism about the future of higher education and the improvement of
the overall quality of our human resources.
They are,
particularly, the recipients of scholarships from the Indonesian government
through the Finance Ministry and the Education Fund Management Institution
(LPDP) and there were about 5,000 of them at the beginning of 2016. Several of
them who are pursuing Doctoral studies in the Netherlands and Germany are
already in their third year, even though they are still only 27 or 28 years
old. Most of those at the Master's degree level are 20 years old. If, after
earning their Master's, they immediately proceed to the Doctoral level, they
will get their PhDs before the age of about 30 years.
That means Indonesia will soon have thousands of young people with
new Doctoral qualifications every year and in the future the average productive
period will be much longer than at present. In Asia, the "grand
harvest" of Indonesia's educated human resources will be surpassed only by
China. Since 10 years ago, the Chinese government has been sending its youth to
study overseas and 6,000 of them reach the Doctoral level every year.
For Indonesia, the sense of optimism is getting increasingly
strong because young Indonesians who are financed by the state do not belong to
a laissez-faire generation. They do not see education solely as a vehicle for
individual vertical mobility. They are not an "uncaring generation"
as described by pedagogue Mochtar Buchori.
As learned
from discussions with a number of LPDP scholarship recipients in the
Netherlands and Germany, their commitment toward Indonesian development is
deeply felt. From the aura of competence, insight, ambition and career
orientation they exude, they confirm that their collective potential is formidable
and bodes well for the progress of the country in the future if they are
properly managed institutionally.
Fresh air
In particular, the presence of young people with Doctoral
qualifications will become a fresh breeze for the university world in Indonesia.
Even though not all of them will be or have become lecturers, the significant
additional numbers of people in the workforce with those qualifications will
improve the competitive power of the universities as one of the job choices.
In line with the Law on Teachers and Lecturers, one of the
requirements to become lecturers is to have at least a Master's degree. Those
with Doctorates enjoy a privileged position because they are classified into a
rare group. By 2013, the number of people with Doctoral degrees in Indonesia
still accounted for only 11 percent of the total 154,968 fully employed
lecturers at universities.
On the other hand, many lecturers with Doctoral qualifications
have approached or passed the age of 50 years. Their productivity has also been
receding. As a result, in many places we meet lecturers with Doctoral
qualifications whose performances do not contribute too significantly to the
improvement of the competitiveness of universities in Indonesia.
With the entrance of thousands of young people with Doctoral
qualifications into the workforce in the next several years, the selection of
university lecturers would become more stringent. Like in Germany, someone's
biological age, the age of his or her Doctoral diploma and the average number
of publications based on the comparison between the biological age and the age
of the Doctoral diploma constitute interrelated factors that are used as basic
considerations in selecting candidates to be lecturers. The objective is to get
a candidate with the most potential, productivity and working life duration as
possible.
The academic atmosphere in universities is expected to also become
increasingly dynamic. There will be a time when Doctoral qualifications alone
do not guarantee quality and expertise. Someone with a Doctoral qualification
will be required to do serious post-doctoral research and consistently publish
in order to survive scientifically. All of this will undoubtedly become
commonplace in Indonesian universities over the next several years.
Youth leadership
However, all of the optimization opportunities for the collective
potential of young people with Doctoral qualifications will be lost if
employment, career systems and reward mechanisms in Indonesia are less
competitive. Our youth with Doctoral qualifications will look for better
opportunities in other countries. The government investment will be useless.
These challenges will be greater because the ASEAN and Asia-Pacific free trade
enables the migration of educated people more easily.
The university world as one of the job choices may miss an
opportunity from the presence of young people with Doctoral qualifications if
there is no quick internal improvement. So far there are complaints about the
lack of laboratory facilities, libraries and research funding. Even though
these things are crucial, I think the root of the problem is in the stagnation
of the system and work climate caused by the character of university leadership
in general, which is not adaptive and is slow to respond to reforming ideas.
On average, the leadership of universities in Indonesia is
currently in the hands of old people. The academic atmosphere is also
determined by the political actions of old people, who make power-plays in the
narrow bureaucracy of the campus. Cases in several places show that the spirit
and willingness of young lecturers to go forward by developing serious research
and academic activities is frequently hindered or even turned off by the
bureaucratic mentality of the superiors and seniors themselves, instead of
giving them room, direction and guidance.
"Being old" here is not only in terms of biological age,
but also in leadership perspective and the orientation of the development of
science. The leadership of the old group could contain relatively young people,
but their academic work, especially their latest research, was carried out five
to 10 years ago, or even more. Among them there are lecturers who do not have
any international scientific experience in their fields. It is not known how universities
with such a leadership profile can fulfill the mission they enthusiastically
formulate for themselves: "To become research universities that are
recognized in the world."
The presence of young people with Doctoral qualifications who have
a new spirit and perspective has the potential to revolutionize the stagnation
of the academic atmosphere and bring about a radical performance renewal.
However, it will not take place if the university leadership paradigm is not
amended to be ready to accept the presence, progress and work dynamics of the
young people.
Therefore, instead of discussing the importation of rectors, which
sparks xenophobic and chauvinistic reactions, it is better for Research,
Technology and Higher Education Minister Mohamad Nasir (and also President Joko
Widodo) to prepare a blueprint for a new paradigm of leadership in universities
to be imbued by the spirit and characteristics of the young people. Among them should
be those who are progressively agile, open to change and accommodative to the
needs and development of the potential of the campus inhabitants. Besides that,
with 35 percent of the voting rights for the election of rectors of state
universities throughout Indonesia in his hands, the minister of research,
technology and higher education himself has to develop within himself the new
paradigm of leadership for universities that is oriented toward the younger
people.
The paradigm of university leadership needs overhauling so that
universities in Indonesia become an interesting and competitive job choice for
thousands of young people with new Doctoral degrees who will return to the
country and will be ready to devote themselves. If the young people with Doctoral
degrees are managed with a leadership that is based on the spirit and the soul
of the times so that they have room to develop optimally, then the future of
universities in Indonesia will certainly be bright. At that time, the issue of
the low ranking of universities and the lack of scientific publications, which
unwittingly become the basis of all strategic policies on the management of
universities at present, will be resolved by itself through their overwhelming
performance.
by Agus
Suwignyo
source
Kompas, Tuesday, June 21, 2016
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar